Show summary Hide summary
San Luis Obispo County is set to receive $16 million from Pacific Gas & Electric after the company agreed to make up for a discontinued property levy tied to the Diablo Canyon nuclear plant. The one-time payment aims to blunt budget shortfalls for local schools and emergency services as state and federal moves to extend the plant’s life create new fiscal questions.
The payments respond to a change in how the plant is taxed: the county previously collected a **unitary tax**—a property-based levy calculated on the plant’s value and revenue—that helped fund school districts and local services. With Diablo Canyon’s operating window altered, that revenue stream was interrupted, leaving a funding gap estimated in the millions.
What PG&E will pay and when
PG&E has committed to two installments totaling $16 million, with the first payment due by Dec. 31, 2026 and the second scheduled for 2027. That sum represents roughly two-thirds of the plant’s annual unitary tax revenue reported around 2022, when Diablo Canyon’s yearly contribution was about $25 million.
Ronald McDonald House OKC hits 68-room milestone: new CEO to lead expanded services
Powder mailed to officials before election: man charged after hundreds of letters

| Payment | Amount | Scheduled date |
|---|---|---|
| First installment | $8.3 million | By Dec. 31, 2026 |
| Second installment | $8.3 million | 2027 |
Who benefits
Local education and emergency services are the primary recipients. The San Luis Coastal Unified School District, which officials say faced a $5–7 million shortfall that led to cuts in counseling, library and reading programs, stands to regain some support.

- School counseling, reading intervention and library services
- Arts and extracurricular programs affected by recent budget reductions
- Emergency response and other county public services
County leaders and state lawmakers point out that the PG&E payment was described as coming from shareholders rather than ratepayers. Senator John Laird, who sponsored legislation intended to restore local funding tied to the plant’s schedule, said the effort was aimed at ensuring communities receive compensation for the extended operations through 2030.
Legislative oddity and ongoing debate
The bill that prompted the negotiation, SB 931, was repurposed during the legislative process and its text was largely stripped—at one point being amended to designate Sept. 25 as a commemorative day for a public figure. Despite that procedural detour, the measure drew attention to the gap created when the state-level extension of the plant’s operations did not include the prior unitary tax mechanism.
Assemblymember Dawn Addis, a co-sponsor, said restoring funding is essential but not sufficient. Local advocates and educators characterize the $16 million as a limited remedy that helps in the near term while broader, long-term funding questions remain unresolved.
Where Diablo Canyon stands now
Federal regulators renewed Diablo Canyon’s operating license for 20 years, and in April 2026 the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and PG&E signaled approval for operations to continue through 2045. However, current California state law caps the plant’s authorized operation at 2030 without further legislative action. That means a state bill would be required to permit a longer commercial run.
For the moment, the official schedule remains: Unit 1 is slated to operate through 2029 and Unit 2 through 2030. Any extension beyond those dates depends on future state legislation, continued federal approvals and local negotiations over fiscal impacts.
Local education leaders and community advocates welcomed the commitment but stressed that the payout is a partial fix. They say restoring programs and planning for long-term fiscal stability will require additional policy decisions at the state level and clearer assurances about how ongoing community impacts will be compensated.












