Show summary Hide summary
Oklahoma’s attorney general has pressed the state insurance chief to publish a delayed review of insurer practices involving roof claims, saying consumers are owed clarity as premiums climb. The dispute, unfolding this week, tightens a spotlight on industry oversight just months before the regulator’s term ends and amid a governor’s race in which the attorney general is a candidate.
Attorney General Gentner Drummond sent a formal letter to Insurance Commissioner Glen Mulready on Monday demanding that the Oklahoma Insurance Department release the full market-conduct examination, its conclusions and supporting documents by the end of the week. Drummond argues the disclosure is urgent because homeowners are facing steep rate increases and claim-handling complaints across the state.
Regulator pushes back, cites integrity of probe
Mulready countered that the examination remains active and warned against accelerating the process to meet a political timetable. He said the department will not shortcut an inquiry overseen by an outside examiner and that findings will be shared only once the review is complete and formally submitted to the agency.
Covell and Coltrane intersection in Edmond to get safety upgrades after public hearing
Oklahoma AG challenges insurance commissioner after contentious homeowners report
The controversy began after Mulready’s office disclosed a two-year probe into how insurers handle roof-related claims — an investigation that followed high-profile lawsuits involving major carriers. The commissioner had initially signaled a public release in the first quarter of 2026; as of late July 2026 the report has not been made public.
What triggered the public clash
Drummond points to three developments in pressing his demand:
- Rising premiums: Many homeowners are seeing record increases in insurance costs, which the attorney general says heightens the need for agency action.
- Timing of the hearing: Drummond says he requested a market competition hearing in April and expected the commissioner to act within 30 days under state law; the hearing was not scheduled until this month for a September date.
- Transparency concerns: The AG frames the release of the examiner’s work as a public right, alleging delays disadvantage consumers and benefit insurers.
Mulready defends process and market view
Mulready repeatedly emphasized the role of procedure, saying the department must preserve the evidentiary integrity of a complex investigation into claim-handling practices. He also noted that, by measures used by federal agencies and industry groups, Oklahoma’s homeowners insurance market remains competitive.
The commissioner, who leaves office in January 2027, said the public hearing was scheduled to help evaluate evidence and inform any future rate filings — but maintained that the formal report will be released only after the independent examiner finalizes and submits it.
Why this matters now
The clash has immediate implications for homeowners, regulators and the upcoming gubernatorial contest. A released report could prompt administrative actions, regulatory referrals or even legislative scrutiny; a continued delay fuels public frustration and gives political opponents fresh material.
- Consumers: Potential policy changes or enforcement actions could affect claim outcomes and premiums.
- Regulatory process: How the state balances thorough investigation with demands for transparency will set a precedent for future probes.
- Politics: With the attorney general on the ballot, the timing and tone of disclosures carry electoral weight.
Both offices say they are acting in the public interest: the AG urging faster transparency to protect ratepayers, and the commissioner insisting on a deliberate review to build a defensible record. In the coming weeks, attention will focus on whether the independent examiner completes the report and whether the scheduled September hearing produces new deadlines or revelations that alter the political and regulatory landscape.
